After a trip through pig intestines, devices could measure temp and deliver drugs.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
It is hard for me to believe that this saves much compared to a small battery which can last a couple days. We are only talking about 1.1V at most here. It may also introduce some uncertainties.
How was this idea overlooked for so long?
As previous comments have stated , it's a staple of grade school science fairs.
This was just a beta, a proof of concept.
later on they can add cameras, injectables etc.
The next step would be surgery without opening your skin, provided they can make the devices small yet powerful enough. Imagine, a tiny robot snipper that targets cancerous polyps in the digestive system etc.
Reduced hospital recovery time etc greater convenience and quality of lifefor the patient.
Thisis just the beginning.
Um, maybe I'm missing something, but I believe the article addresses the question of what advantage this approach has compared to a device using an ordinary battery:How was this idea overlooked for so long?
As previous comments have stated , it's a staple of grade school science fairs.
Although it's kinda neat, it doesn't solve any particularly pressing problems. Ordinary batteries and externally powered probes already have this territory covered.
I'm actually not sure what, if any, advantage this approach brings to the table.
As for externally powered, I don't think you can have a device powered via a cable travel down the intestinal tract or any do any other activity that requires the device be active over multiple days. Plus, I'd certainly prefer one of these over swallowing something with a cable attached regardless of the length of time.Consumable contraptions have already proved useful for video capture and health monitoring. They measure things like breathing, temperature, pH, drug delivery, heart rate, and pressure. But most gulp-able gadgets still require an old-fashioned battery, which can cause life-threatening burns and injuries in living tissue.
Um, maybe I'm missing something, but I believe the article addresses the question of what advantage this approach has compared to a device using an ordinary battery:How was this idea overlooked for so long?
As previous comments have stated , it's a staple of grade school science fairs.
Although it's kinda neat, it doesn't solve any particularly pressing problems. Ordinary batteries and externally powered probes already have this territory covered.
I'm actually not sure what, if any, advantage this approach brings to the table.
As for externally powered, I don't think you can have a device powered via a cable travel down the intestinal tract or any do any other activity that requires the device be active over multiple days. Plus, I'd certainly prefer one of these over swallowing something with a cable attached regardless of the length of time.Consumable contraptions have already proved useful for video capture and health monitoring. They measure things like breathing, temperature, pH, drug delivery, heart rate, and pressure. But most gulp-able gadgets still require an old-fashioned battery, which can cause life-threatening burns and injuries in living tissue.